Joanne Rader: “It’s the Direct-Care Worker, Stupid”

“My passion for working with people with dementia, for making life better for them, has been my major motivating factor. But over time, I keep saying to myself: ‘It’s the direct-care worker, stupid,’” says Joanne Rader. “The only way to make the lives of people with dementia better is to improve the working lives of the direct-care workers. We need to put the things in place that let them provide relationship-based care.”

Now a consultant, Rader has helped pioneer key advances in reducing the use of restraints and finding conflict-free ways of bathing in long-term care. The co-author of Individualized Dementia Care: Creative, Compassionate Approaches and Bathing Without a Battle, which won Book of the Year awards from the American Journal of Nursing in 1996 and 2002, she is one of the founders of the Pioneer Network.

She learned to appreciate the contributions made by direct-care workers early in her career. “I’ve always had a tremendous amount of respect for the work they do, and also for the informal power they have. I might have had the best solution in the world, but if I didn’t have their buy-in, it wasn’t going to get anywhere.”

“I had some ideas, but the bulk of them came from the direct-care workers”
Rader spent about 27 of her 35 years in long-term care as a mental health nurse specialist in Providence Benedictine Nursing Center in Mount Angel, Oregon. “I’m a pretty hands-on person - I like to get in right at the care level,” says Rader. “But I’ve had to pull back and look at systems, because you can’t get the good stuff into practice unless the system supports it.” And most long-term care systems, she found, fail to tap the “absolutely essential information about the residents” that only direct-care workers hold.

In her work to improve care quality at Providence Benedictine, she says: “A lot of the ideas came from the direct-care workers. I learned that the way to succeed in problem solving was by tapping their expertise.”

Take Bathing Without a Battle, a popular video and curriculum co-authored by Rader that teaches caregivers how to transform the way people with dementia are bathed. “I’m just the messenger,” says Rader. “I had some ideas, but the bulk of them came from the direct-care workers.” CNA Cathy House, for instance, was “just a master at figuring out all the possible ways to get people clean.” And CNA Beth Parker not only contributed her own ideas but marshaled those of her coworkers, taking the initiative to teach what she had learned when helping Rader pilot the program to the other aides in her facility’s dementia care units. “Together, they revamped the bathing plans of all the other residents,” says Rader. “They were very creative about how to do it.”

Direct-care workers can be ”very powerful teachers”
Rader brought in CNAs as often as possible to help her teach the bathing curriculum. “I knew I was really doing culture change when I was at a conference and an aide I had worked with was presenting with me, and at the end, the questions were almost all directed at her. It was clear that she had answers I didn’t - she was the one doing it on a daily basis.”

She regrets not having tapped into that expertise earlier in her career, when she was teaching about restraint-free care. “By the time I did the bathing work, I had picked up the resentment direct-care workers had about people who come in to teach them about their work who don’t really understand their work,” she says. Besides, she says, their passion for providing good care and the stories they tell about things that happened on the job can make direct-care workers “very powerful teachers.”

“It’s not easy unless you have a facility that supports the workers”
Bathing Without a Battle is part of the Pioneer Network’s larger mission of making long-term care facilities true homes, replacing the top-down, hospital-style care delivery model with a “person-directed” method of responding to individual preferences and needs.

But person-directed care can only work, Rader says, if direct-care workers are empowered. Bathing Without a Battle is “not that expensive, and the skill base needed is pretty minimal. You can learn it in about a few hours. But it’s not easy to do unless you have a facility that has consistent assignment and that supports the workers to make decisions and act on what they know about the residents.

“If we’re going to provide person-directed care, we need to really listen to what people want; we can’t just impose things on them. For direct-care workers, that means the way that they relate to people is more important than getting certain tasks done at certain times. The workers know when it’s a good day to give someone a shower, or whether they need to try something different than a shower. So rather than make them spend time explaining themselves to the nurse, just let them go ahead and make the adaptation.

“I hear from aides who are criticized for talking ‘too much’ to residents,” she adds. “But if you ask almost anybody who works in long-term care why they do it, they’ll say it’s because of the relationships they have with the residents, the elders. That’s the hub that everything else comes from.”

Interview by Elise Nakhnikian, Senior Online Editor
enakhnikian@phinational.org

5 Responses to “Joanne Rader: “It’s the Direct-Care Worker, Stupid””


  1. 1 Patricia Downing

    Hats off to Joanne Radar for recognizing that the direct care workers knows more about their residents than most nurses do. We spend way more time with them and are able to communicate with our residents than any other staff person. It’s time for us to be given the recognition of knowing what is best for our residents.

  2. 2 Maria DeStefanis

    What a refreshing article!It’s about time Direct Care Workers where reconized as the proffessionals they truly are.As explained in the article, Direct Care staff opionions, suggestions and acceptance of solutions is crucial for success. When Adminstrative and Sr.Staff members communicate or present ideas to Direct Staff and Middle Management without making them part of the process this strips them of their dignity and sense of importance-a real moral zapper to say the least. In addittion, soliciting their in-put is a loss to the individuals we are assisting and supporting.If Direct Care Staff know their opinion and information they provide will be valued and reconized everyone wins from the Administrative / Sr.Staff to the most important people of all - those we are supporting and helping. While this article is based on Direct Care in a medical setting it can be applied to almost any Social or Human Services setting. Kudos and a million thanks to Joanne Radar!!

  3. 3 Ria Turner

    Thank you Joanne Radar - what an up-lifting article.
    Direct Care workers are all too often left out of the solution process until someone who may have never had a conversation with the individual let alone worked with the individual comes along to inform the Direct Care staff what they should or should not be doing. Other times, Direct Care people play a valued role but are never given reconition or credit for how valued the role they play in an individuals life is. If everyone at the top had the same approach as Joanne Radar maybe those in the Middle or on the Direct Level could recieve the information, dignity, and respect they so well deseve.

    Ria Turner - Philadelphia

  4. 4 Toni Stefan

    If only everyone would acknowledge and practive Joanne Radar’s philosphy. All too often, those in Upper / Sr.Management propose solutions and ideas which look perfect on paper but are’nt the true reality. Direct Care Staff Workers really do know how to approach situations with the individuals they work with every day and realize specific and specified times are not always the solution and some situations require an individualized approach that only the Direct Care Staff are able to achieve. What a great article.

  5. 5 Chris

    Bravo! A very enlightening article.

    Management need to seek input from the direct care staff, as they have the most up to date knowledge of the consumer’s needs. Often times when an annual review meeting is scheduled for the consumers at my work site, the management does not know the names of the clients with whom they are meeting. By including one (or two!) direct care staff, the real important issues could be brought up for discussion. It’s the Direct Care staff that have the “boots on the ground” and know the areas where things could be improved on.

    Until management starts using this huge informational asset, they will continue to make rules/decisions based purely on how it affects the budget.

    Keep the articles coming! I look forward to each one and have gotten quite a bit of information from reading them!

Leave a Reply